Dino killing meteor
Home / Technology News / 2008 / May 2008 / May 7, 2008
Dino-killing meteor may have ignited oil field rather than forests, 65 million years ago

Top News

Andhra Pradesh SSC 2008 Results

Rededication Day marks Congress Government's fourth year in office

Second phase of polling in Karnataka ends

India deeply values its ties with Bhutan, to enhance it: Manmohan Singh

Bollywood film Aashayein all set for release

Chidambaram blames Inflation on soaring global oil prices

Manchester bans big screens for Champion League Final fearing violence

Body clock cog finding could end jet lag

Bird flu spreads in Darjeeling

Dino-killing meteor may have ignited oil field rather than forests, 65 million years ago

Geologists have come up with a new theory, which suggests that the dino-killing Chicxulub meteor might have ignited an oil field rather than forests when it slammed into the Gulf of Mexico 65 million years ago.

Washington, May 7 : Geologists have come up with a new theory, which suggests that the dino-killing Chicxulub meteor might have ignited an oil field rather than forests when it slammed into the Gulf of Mexico 65 million years ago.

According to a report in Discovery News, smoke-related particles found in sediments formed at the time of the impact are strikingly similar to those created by modern high-temperature coal and oil burning, as opposed to forest fires.

Evidence of some sort of large burn that perhaps created a global climate change at the end of the Cretaceous has been around since the 1980s. But, it has not been settled just what sort of fire it was.

"It seemed like (vegetation) wildfires were the easiest solution," said geochemist Wendy Wolbach of DePaul University, who worked on evidence of the fires at the time.

There was even the discovery of a chemical called retene, which is released by cone-bearing trees when they burn in forest fires today.

However, that was before the Chicxulub crater had been identified.

"What's more, it has never been certain that the fires were global, as some have suggested. For one thing, there has never been a lot of fossil charcoal found from that time, which would be expected if there had been so much vegetation burning," said Wolbach.

"There isn't enough charcoal to account for that," said Simon Brassell of Indiana University.

What Brassell and his colleagues found instead were particles called cenospheres, which resemble the sooty output of industrial coal and oil burning.When cenospheres are found, they are usually associated with what's known as fly ash, which is manmade.

"In many places, the presence of such material is taken as evidence as the presence of human activities," said Brassell.

Since the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary is about 65 million years too early for humans and their coal-fired Industrial Revolution, something else had to be burning fossil fuels.

Thus, Brassell and his team have suggested that the Chicxulub meteor crashed into oily shales of the Gulf of Mexico, which caused the oil in the rocks to vaporize and ignite in the air, making cenospheres in the process.

Today, the large oil fields that edge right up to the Chicxulub structure testify to the ample supply of oil available to burn 65 million years ago.

According to Brassell, it's even likely the impact itself was responsible for the fracturing and heating of the rocks in that region and allowing the oil to collect into the large pools, which are found there today.

ANI

May 16, 2008

May 15, 2008

May 14, 2008

May 13, 2008

May 12, 2008

May 11, 2008