Green buildings
Home / Technology News / 2008 / March 2008 / March 23, 2008
Green buildings may be cheapest way to slow down global warming
Solar / Photovoltaic Industry

Solarpowergetics Installs Bright Solar Outdoor Lights in Southern California, Power to the People

Canadian Solar to Present at the 2007 Deutsche Bank Technology Conference

Suntech to Announce First Quarter 2007 Financial Results on May 29, 2007

Global Solar Photovoltaic Market Breathes Fire After Initial 'Feedstock' Choke

PM's inaugural speech at the International Conference on Strategies for Energy Conservation in the New Millennium

First Gas Discovery under NELP named - Annapurna

Remarkable progress in Cryogenics

Features on Solar Energy

Top News

Karnataka High Court orders Ramoji Rao to appear in Ballari Court

CCEA approves scheme on National Mission on Medicinal Plants

Magnets could keep sharks at bay!

Pammie was first choice for X-Files lead role!

Chidambaran says government to speed up reforms

ICC chief Haroon Lorgat to meet the media in Colombo

Bossy parents cause older teens to indulge in more sex

Aussies turning in droves to alternative therapies

Green buildings may be cheapest way to slow down global warming

A new report has determined that constructing more energy-efficient buildings might be the cheapest way to cut greenhouse gas emissions and slow down global warming.

Washington, March 23 : A new report has determined that constructing more energy-efficient buildings might be the cheapest way to cut greenhouse gas emissions and slow down global warming.

According to a report in the Scientific American, the report, carried out by the Montreal-based Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), building green buildings and upgrading the insulation and windows in the existing ones, could save 1.7 billion tons of carbon dioxide annually.

This literally means cutting greenhouse gas emissions by more than 25 percent.

"This is the cheapest, quickest, most significant way to make a dent in greenhouse gas emissions," said Jonathan Westeinde, chief executive of green developer Windmill Development Group in Ottawa, Ontario, and chair of the CEC report.

Yet, "green buildings"-defined by the report as "environmentally preferable practices and materials in the design, location, construction, operation and disposal of buildings"-represents only 2 percent of the commercial edifices in the U.S. and 0.3 percent of new homes.

According to Westeinde, a big part of the problem is that many builders are unwilling to invest extra money for more efficient energy and water systems that only translate into cost savings for the eventual owners.

But, Westeinde's company gets around this dilemma by working out long-term financing arrangements with owners, who agree share a portion of their future cost savings with the developer.

The price gap between energy-efficient and conventional construction might eventually disappear as green buildings become more common.

"If everyone is using a certain type of window that drives cost down," said Westeinde.

"Green construction is only 4 percent of the market which means the other 96 percent are creating a volume discount for themselves. But if green becomes 50 percent of the industry, that cost differential goes away," he added.

The report calls for the Canadian, Mexican and U.S. governments to set specific targets for green buildings as well as to adopt continental standards, such as siting buildings in a way that maximizes passive solar heating and cooling.

According to Evan Lloyd, CEC director of programs, "It is the best systems and technology that can be applied to reduce energy consumption as well as paying attention to resource inputs."

ANI

July 24, 2008

July 23, 2008

July 22, 2008

July 21, 2008

July 20, 2008

July 19, 2008