< %=imgalt%>
US Elections Calendar ~ Barak Obama ~ Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry ~ Other International News
Home / International News / 2008 / July 2008 / July 29, 2008
Howard Government was repeatedly told that Haneef was no threat
Mohammad Haneef

Blame game over Dr Haneef terrorism case breaks out Down Under

Aussie Police had found jihadist materials in Dr Haneefs flat after arrest

Oz Police knew they lacked evidence before Dr Haneef was charged for terror

Former Oz minister appears at Haneef inquiry

More on Mohammad Haneef

Top News

Chiranjeevi welcomes newcomers with clean record into politics

Tony Blair vows for a coordinated effort to tackle global meltdown

Pak Govt. hasnt provided funds for pleading Aafias case

Bruce Springsteen bags Billboards Top Tour award

American tax payers ready to let Big Three automakers go under

Dhoni refutes rift over team selection

Party advertised on Facebook ends in chaos after 60 gatecrash the event

Modern plagues share certain features with ancient ones

Howard Government was repeatedly told that Haneef was no threat

Australias security intelligence agency repeatedly told the Howard Government when it was in power last year that former terror suspect Mohamed Haneef posed no security threat.

Melbourne, July 29 : Australia's security intelligence agency repeatedly told the Howard Government when it was in power last year that former terror suspect Mohamed Haneef posed no security threat.

According to news.com.au, in an unclassified submission to the inquiry into last year's bungled investigation of the Gold Coast-based doctor, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) Director-General Paul O'Sullivan has revealed his organisation never believed Dr Haneef was a threat.

Dr Haneef was arrested in Brisbane and detained for 12 days without charge last year over suspected links to botched terror attacks in Britain.

He was later charged but the case against him collapsed amid accusations of bungling by the authorities.

ASIO conducted an intelligence investigation into Dr Haneef and provided analytical support to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), but never questioned Dr Haneef itself.

"In conducting its intelligence investigation, ASIO considered whether Dr Haneef posed a threat to security and provided advice across government on this issue," Mr O'Sullivan said.

"ASIO participated in whole-of-government meetings in relation to Dr Haneef.

"ASIO's consistent advice to these meetings was that, based on available information, ASIO did not assess Dr Haneef as a threat to security and did not have grounds to issue an adverse security assessment."

O'Sullivan also said that ASIO was not involved in the decisions to arrest, charge, prosecute or release Dr Haneef.

Meanwhile, lawyers acting for Dr Haneef said they wanted the Clarke inquiry to be given the powers of a royal commission.

Retired NSW Supreme Court judge John Clarke, who is heading the inquiry, yesterday declared much of the evidence presented to him cannot be made public and he would not be seeking royal commission powers.

Dr Haneef's lawyer Rod Hodgson today said the Rudd Government had promised a full judicial inquiry.

"Whatever this inquiry is, it is not judicial and it is not open," he said.

"It is a very convenient result for the Australian agencies, especially the AFP and DIAC (Department of Immigration and Citizenship), in that they cannot be made accountable to the Australian public because of an alleged fear of offending a foreign government.

ANI

November 22, 2008

November 21, 2008

November 20, 2008

November 19, 2008

November 18, 2008

November 17, 2008