![]() |
| Andhra Pradesh ~ India ~ International ~ City ~ Entertainment ~ Business ~ Bullion ~ Forex ~ Sports ~ Technology ~ Health ~ Features |
| US Elections Calendar ~ Barak Obama ~ Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry ~ Other International News |
|
Home
/ International News / 2007 / September 2007 / September 6, 2007 Musharraf cannot hold two offices after the expiry of his tenure: Pak SC |
US think tank urges halt to air strikes
Sharif declines to appear before PCO judges in Supreme Court
Learn from India about rule of law and good governance: Deposed Pak Chief Justice
Rift opens up between Pak Army, government in wake of Mumbai attacks
Musharraf urges to strengthen democracy in Pakistan
Send Pasha, we will put him up in the best suite in Mumbais Taj Hotel
Praja Rajyam decides to approach court to vacate the stay on roadshows
Deadly attacks on Mumbai were carried from inside Pakistan: Pranab
Pak security forces kill 14 militants in Mohmand
Jordan says she couldnt give a f*** about son-ignoring ex beau
British Council in partnership with TERI launches International Climate Champions 2009
Chennai Police expect England team to land on Monday
The Pakistan Supreme Court has said that President Pervez Musharraf cannot hold two offices after his term as President expires.
Islamabad, Sep 6 : The Pakistan Supreme Court has said that President Pervez Musharraf cannot hold two offices after his term as President expires.
The apex court was hearing a petition filed by the Jamaat-e-Islami, challenging the 'President to Hold Another Office Act 2004'.
"I think Musharraf cannot hold another office when his term expires and (then) Article 43 would be activated," Justice Justice Faqir Muhammad Khokhar said.
Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry's asked Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada, counsel for Musharraf, to tell the court when the President's term ends.
Pirzada said that he would seek Musharraf's instructions before mentioning the date his term ends.
Akram Sheikh, counsel for the petitioner, argued that all Presidents other than Musharraf were elected under Article 41 of the Constitution and that the state was now being run by a "de facto" President.
Sheikh submitted that Musharraf could not hold two offices simultaneously and the relaxation given to him for holding the offices of President and Army Chief under the 17th Amendment had ended on December 31, 2004.
He argued that Act VII of the 'President to Hold Another Office Act 2004', under which Musharraf was allowed to keep both offices beyond December 31, 2004, ran against Article 63(1)(d) of the Constitution.
Sheikh said that person-specific legislation was illegal, and that's what the 17th Amendment was, as it benefited only one person - Musharraf, the Daily Times reported.
ANI