![]() |
| Andhra Pradesh ~ India ~ International ~ City ~ Entertainment ~ Business ~ Bullion ~ Forex ~ Sports ~ Technology ~ Health ~ Features |
| US Elections Calendar ~ Barak Obama ~ Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry ~ Other International News |
|
Home
/ International News / 2007 / September 2007 / September 6, 2007 Democracy for nuclear Pakistan could be catastrophic |
Urgent need to re-evaluate threat to Pakistan: Dawn editorial
NWFP asks Pak Government to act over Taliban build-up in Jamrud
Pressure mounting on Centre to be tough with Pakistan after Mumbai attacks
Rift opens up between Pak Army, government in wake of Mumbai attacks
Musharraf urges to strengthen democracy in Pakistan
Send Pasha, we will put him up in the best suite in Mumbais Taj Hotel
Western intelligence experts says Mumbai terror strikes has Al-Qaeda hallmark
Osamas driver to be moved to native Yemen from Guantanamo Bay
Al Qaeda could soon be on decline, having alienated Muslim supporters
Praja Rajyam decides to approach court to vacate the stay on roadshows
Deadly attacks on Mumbai were carried from inside Pakistan: Pranab
Pak security forces kill 14 militants in Mohmand
Jordan says she couldnt give a f*** about son-ignoring ex beau
British Council in partnership with TERI launches International Climate Champions 2009
Chennai Police expect England team to land on Monday
Democracy for a nuclear weapon enriched Pakistan could have catastrophic results, says noted Canadian author and journalist, George Jonas.
Washington, Sept 6 : Democracy for a nuclear weapon enriched Pakistan could have catastrophic results, says noted Canadian author and journalist, George Jonas.
"Democracy may come to Pakistan before long, and with it, catastrophe. That's not because democracy is bad, but because it's so good, so accommodating, that it may open the door to something very bad, even monstrous. And it may do so in a country that has the bomb," he argues in an article, published in Canwest News Service.
The author, who has written books like "Vengeance: The True Story of an Israeli Counter-Terrorist Team", states that President General Pervez Musharraf's quasi-military dictatorship is not the only alternative to a Taliban-style theocracy in Pakistan.
"That's true. A sane and friendly strongman isn't necessarily the only alternative to a hostile or insane ayatollah. It's an effective alternative, though. Whether the kind of democracy that may replace it would be equally effective is unproven, and Pakistan is too volatile a laboratory for the experiment," he adds.
In order to prove his point, the writer illustrates that civilian rule in Pakistan has been "characterized by chaos and corruption, economic instability, and social injustice."
"Iran may wish to have the Muslim bomb, but Pakistan already has it. Under the circumstances, whose finger would you prefer to see on the trigger? The best democrats in Pakistan - or anyone other than Osama bin Laden?" he questions, adding that the main concern is not the viability of the western-style democracy, but whether western-style democracy can be made to work in an eastern-style culture.
"And, when we have a verdict, it may be too late," Jonas concludes.
ANI