![]() |
| Andhra Pradesh ~ India ~ International ~ City ~ Entertainment ~ Business ~ Bullion ~ Forex ~ Sports ~ Technology ~ Health ~ Features |
| US Elections Calendar ~ Barak Obama ~ Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry ~ Other International News |
|
Home
/ International News / 2007 / October 2007 / October 26, 2007 Verdicts on Musharraf holding two offices may be reviewed: Pak SC |
Rift opens up between Pak Army, government in wake of Mumbai attacks
Musharraf urges to strengthen democracy in Pakistan
Send Pasha, we will put him up in the best suite in Mumbais Taj Hotel
Praja Rajyam decides to approach court to vacate the stay on roadshows
Deadly attacks on Mumbai were carried from inside Pakistan: Pranab
Pak security forces kill 14 militants in Mohmand
Jordan says she couldnt give a f*** about son-ignoring ex beau
British Council in partnership with TERI launches International Climate Champions 2009
Chennai Police expect England team to land on Monday
The Supreme Court (SC) has said that it could review the judgements in the Pakistan Lawyers Forum (PLF) and Qazi Hussain Ahmed cases that validated General Pervez Musharrafs holding of two offices if the petitioners lawyers convinced the court to do so.
Islamabad, Oct 26 : The Supreme Court (SC) has said that it could review the judgements in the Pakistan Lawyers Forum (PLF) and Qazi Hussain Ahmed cases that validated General Pervez Musharraf's holding of two offices if the petitioners' lawyers convinced the court to do so.
"The two judgements are not the final word and can be reviewed if we're convinced by the counsel," said Justice Javed Iqbal while hearing the petitions against the acceptance of Musharraf's nomination papers.
Aitzaz Ahsan, counsel for Justice (retired) Wajeehuddin Ahmed, said the court's judgements in the PLF and Qazi Hussain cases were 'per incuriam' with the Constitution.
Per incuriam refers to a judgment, which has been decided without reference to a statutory provision, or earlier judgement, which would have been relevant, the Daily Times reported.
Justice Iqbal said that the counsel had raised such arguments for the first time and the court, if convinced, court could review its judgements in the two cases.
Aitzaz said that the SC had decided the Qazi Hussain case before the Parliament adopted the 17th Amendment, and the PLF case had been decided by merely relying on the Qazi Hussain case, when neither applied to Musharraf's next term.
ANI