![]() |
| Andhra Pradesh ~ India ~ International ~ City ~ Entertainment ~ Business ~ Bullion ~ Forex ~ Sports ~ Technology ~ Health ~ Features |
| Panchang ~ Manmohan Singh ~ Sonia Gandhi ~ Stock Markets ~ Gossip |
|
Home
/ India News / 2007 / September 2007 / September 5, 2007 Delhi court postpones Uphaar fire tragedy case verdict to October 22 |
Judge appears before cash-at-judges door probe panel
Scarlett Keeling murder accused released on bail
Praja Rajyam membership drive from October 2
Sikh Jatha visiting Pakistan on 474th birth anniversary celebrations of Guru Ram Das
Work stress costs firms billions, says study
Star Trek star Patrick Stewart to play Time Lord in Dr Who
Sensex hovers around 12,000, lowest in two years
Shocked O.J. Simpson senses a conspiracy
Honeybees decode the waggle dance by applying simple maths
NERA Economic Consulting Expands Presence in China with New Beijing Office
A Delhi court today postponed its verdict in connection with the 1997 Uphaar Cinema fire tragedy case till October 22, in which 59 people lost their lives during the screening of the Hindi film, Border.
New Delhi, Sept. 5 : A Delhi court today postponed its verdict in connection with the 1997 Uphaar Cinema fire tragedy case till October 22, in which 59 people lost their lives during the screening of the Hindi film, "Border".
Besides prime accused Gopal and Sushil Ansal, the owners of the cinema hall, there were 12 accused in the case, whose fate will be decided on that day.
N K Bhardwaj, who was present there when the Delhi Police was taking out the bodies, said: "People are losing confidence in the judiciary. Not this case, even in the Bhopal case, judgement has always been delayed. Culprits and politicians have always been set free."
Four accused - - R. M. Puri, K. L. Malhotra (both senior employees of hall), S. N. Dandona (Executive Engineer of the Public Works Department) and Delhi Fire Services officer Surender Dutt - - have died during the trial.
Among the other accused are R. K. Sharma, Ajit Chaudhary, N. S. Chopra, Manmohan Uniyal, Shyam Sunder Sharma, N. D. Tiwari, Hanswaroop Panwar, B. M. Satija, A. K. Gera and Beer Singh.
All the accused have been charged under Section 14 of the Cinematography Act.
The CBI had filed a chargesheet on November 15, 1997, and the court admitted it on January 19, 1998.
The Association of the Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT) had lodged an FIR alleging death due to negligence against the prime accused, Gopal and Sushil Ansal, owners of the cinema hall.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had alleged that the accused were directly and criminally negligent in the management of the theatre.
Senior advocate Harish Salve contended that owners of the cinema hall were liable for penal action.
During the 10-year-old trial, the CBI had examined 115 witnesses. Among them, eight witnesses, termed as relatives of Ansals, have already turned hostile.
Fifty-nine people were choked to death, while 109 survived with injuries after the Uphaar Cinema caught fire leading to a stampede on June 13, 1997.
The theatre was engulfed when an overheated generator burst in the basement of the building. Men, women and children all scampered to rush out of the four cinema hall exits.
ANI