< %=imgalt%>
Panchang ~ Manmohan Singh ~ Sonia Gandhi ~ Stock Markets ~ Gossip
Home / India News / 2007 / September 2007 / September 22, 2007
Hindu cleric, lawyer up in arms over Lord Rama row

Top News

Praja Rajyam decides to approach court to vacate the stay on roadshows

Muslims to wear black ribbons on Bakr-Eid: Imams

Pak Hindus, Chinese and Japanese need Indian visas to immerse ashes of loved ones

Boy Georges male escort is unreliable, claims singers lawyer

Punnamada Serena Spa Resort relaunches in Allepey

Manchester City to spend 70 m pounds on transfers

Noisy oceans threaten survival of whales and dolphins

Extract of the plant cats claw may harbour dengue cure

Hindu cleric, lawyer up in arms over Lord Rama row

A Hindu cleric in Ayodhya and a Madras High Court lawyer have reacted strongly to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhis questioning of Lord Rams existence.

Ayodhya (Uttar Pradesh) / New Delhi, Sept. 22 : A Hindu cleric in Ayodhya and a Madras High Court lawyer have reacted strongly to Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi's questioning of Lord Ram's existence.

Ramvilasdas Vedanti, former lawmaker and a member of Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi Trust, said Karunanidhi had insulted Lord Rama."The one who will bring the head and tongue of the person who has insulted Lord Rama will be rewarded with a bounty by the saints of Ayodhya," Vedanti said.

Karunanidhi's ally and Railways Minister Lalu Prasad, however, tried to play down the controversy.

"We Hindus have faith in all gods and goddesses like Shiva, Rama, Sita and Hanuman. But, we cannot force a person to have faith in them. There are many in the country who do not believe. So, we should not say that someone has said this or that. It is more than enough that we have faith," he said.

R K Venkatesh, an advocate in the Madras High Court, has also filed a complaint against Karunanidhi.

The complaint sought the removal of Karunanidhi from the post of Chief Minister.

Venkatesh contended that Karunanidhi's remarks had wounded his religious feelings.

He accused Karunanidhi of committing offences under Section 295 A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs) and Section 298 (uttering word etc. with deliberate intent to hurt religious feelings) of the Indian Penal Code.

Karunanidhi's statement surfaced amidst a raging row over an affidavit filed by the Central Government in the Supreme Court earlier this month on a Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project, saying that Hinduism's most important texts are not proof of the existence of Hindu gods.

The government later backtracked on the 'affidavit' and sought three months time from the apex court to file an amended affidavit, following threats of nationwide protests by the BJP.

Karunanidhi, however, has asked the Central Government to go ahead with the project coming along the Tamil Nadu coast.

ANI

December 4, 2008

December 3, 2008

December 2, 2008

December 1, 2008

November 30, 2008

November 29, 2008