Rowling  court
Britney Spears ~ Angelina Jolie ~ Sandra Bullock ~ Jennifer Lopez ~ Daniel Radcliffe ~ All Celebrities ~ All Actress ~ All Actors
Home / Entertainment News / 2008 / March 2008 / March 11, 2008
Rowling in court again, demanding ban on sons pic

Top News

Andhra Pradesh SSC 2008 Results

Rededication Day marks Congress Government's fourth year in office

Gods in Puri given sandalwood bath

Cherie fell in love with Tony Blair on top deck of bus No.74

Elton John to perform at Nelson Mandelas 90th birthday concert

Citi commits US

Rowling in court again, demanding ban on sons pic

Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling appeared in court on Monday in a last-ditch attempt to get an injunction banning the media from publishing a picture of her son David, which was clicked on a family outing when the child was 18 months old.

London, March 11 : Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling appeared in court on Monday in a last-ditch attempt to get an injunction banning the media from publishing a picture of her son David, which was clicked on a family outing when the child was 18 months old.

Rowling's previous attempt before a London High Court went futile with the court ruling against her in August last year.

The writer has filed the suit against photo agency Big Pictures under her married name of Joanne Murray along with her husband Neil.

While representing the couple at London's Civil Appeal Court on Monday, their solicitor Richard Spearman QC claimed that child's right to privacy had been infringed.

"This claim is not about the rights of adults, this is about the rights of the child," the BBC quoted Spearman as saying.

The photo agency, on the other hand, claimed that there was no proof that the child had been hurt.

"The reality is that claimants' lawyers have never been able to identify any concrete way in which the child has been harmed," Mark Warby QC, representing the company, said.

When the photo was clicked in 2004 in Edinburgh, the family was unaware of it.

The Sunday Express magazine had printed the photograph alongside an article about Rowling's approach to motherhood.

Rowling now wants damages for infringement of privacy, and an injunction banning further publication of the photograph.

ANI

May 15, 2008

May 14, 2008

May 13, 2008

May 12, 2008

May 11, 2008

May 10, 2008