Kidman snapper
Britney Spears ~ Angelina Jolie ~ Sandra Bullock ~ Jennifer Lopez ~ Daniel Radcliffe ~ All Celebrities ~ All Actress ~ All Actors
Home / Entertainment News / 2008 / February 2008 / February 27, 2008
Kidman snapper to appeal loses defamation case
Nicole Kidman

Why Kidman and Urban named their baby girl Sunday Rose

Madonna stands to lose millions in case she never signed a prenup

Its a baby girl for Nicole Kidman!

Celebrities secret phobias revealed

More on Nicole Kidman

Top News

Karnataka High Court orders Ramoji Rao to appear in Ballari Court

Indian scientists use cow urine for better rearing of honeybees

Oz bank to outsource 400 new jobs to India by year-end

Rhythm Is A Dancer by Snap tops Worst Lyric of All Time poll

Sabarimala Swamy Ayyappan Temple replica comes up Pochampally

Nadals gal prefers to remain in the background

Bluetongue virus uses unique viral enzymes to replicate

Maintaining a food diary can help double your diet weight loss

Kidman snapper to appeal loses defamation case

Sydney paparazzo Jamie Fawcett has lost the defamation case against Fairfax Media, involving actress Nicole Kidman.

Sydney, Feb 27 : Sydney paparazzo Jamie Fawcett has lost the defamation case against Fairfax Media, involving actress Nicole Kidman.

Fawcett had sued Fairfax Media over a 2005 article in The Sun-Herald that stated he was "undoubtedly Sydney's most inventive and most disliked freelance photographer" and was possessed of a "determination to wreak havoc on Kidman's private life".

New South Wales Supreme Court Justice Simpson ruled out the charges and said that she "emphatically preferred" the testimony of Kidman and her employees John Manning and Malcolm Carter than the testimony by Fawcett and fellow paparazzo Ben McDonald.

"While I found Mr Manning to be a credible witness, I did not take the same view of Mr Fawcett or Mr McDonald," Sydney Morning Herald quoted Justice Simpson, as saying in judgment.

"Each was a witness on whose evidence I am not prepared to place any reliance," she added.

She has also ruled out Fawcett's testimony that he was not the person who placed a listening device on Kidman's property in 2005.

"I am satisfied it was Mr Fawcett who placed the listening device," she stated.

Kidman had told the court that the snapper chased her car across Sydney in 2005 at such speeds that made her crouch on the back seat, tearful and frightened of crashing.

However, Fawcett said that he was "very disappointed" with the decision and would be appealing again.

He has been asked to pay the media company's costs that comes out to be a high six-figure sum.

ANI

July 9, 2008

July 8, 2008

July 7, 2008

July 6, 2008

July 5, 2008

July 4, 2008